Textual content by Tom Appel
2025 Mazda CX-70 3.3 Turbo S Premium Plus AWD
Specs
Class: Midsize Crossover
Coloration: Polymetal Grey
Seating Capability: 5
Miles pushed: 131
Actual-world gas economic system: 22.4 mpg
| CG Report Card | |
|---|---|
| Room and Consolation | B+ |
| Energy and Efficiency | B+ |
| Match and End | A |
| Gasoline Economic system | B+ |
| Worth | B |
| Report-card grades are derived from a consensus of test-driver evaluations. All grades are versus different automobiles in the identical class. Worth grade is for particular trim degree evaluated, and will not replicate Shopper Information’s impressions of all the mannequin lineup. | |
| Large & Tall Consolation | |
| Large Man | A |
| Tall Man | B+ |
| Large & Tall consolation rankings are for entrance seats solely. “Large” score primarily based on male tester weighing roughly 350 kilos, “Tall” score primarily based on 6’6″-tall male tester. | |
| Drivetrain | |
| Engine Specs | 340-horsepower 3.3-liter |
| Engine Kind | Turbo inline six gentle hybrid |
| Transmission | 8-speed computerized |
| Drive Wheels | AWD |
Driving combine: 60% metropolis, 40% freeway
EPA-estimated gas economic system: 23/28/25 (metropolis, freeway, mixed)
Gasoline sort: Premium fuel
Base worth: $55,950 (not together with $1375 vacation spot cost)
Choices on check car: None
Value as examined: $57,775
Professionals and Cons
The nice: Roomy and refined
The nice: Good energy, respectable gas economic system, premium-feel cabin
The not so good: Low-speed drivetrain surging
Assessment
Did the world really want the CX-70? Mazda’s latest U.S.-market providing is priced slightly below the midsize CX-90 crossover within the model’s U.S.-market lineup, however is roughly the identical measurement and differs solely gently in design. Certainly, the CX-70 is lower than an inch shorter than the CX-90 in general size, and rides on the identical 123-inch wheelbase.
So, what’s the deal? The CX-70 comes solely with two seating rows, versus the ‘90s three. That, and a few styling variations, principally designed to make the CX-70 seem sportier, account for many of the distinction between the 2 largest and most-expensive Mazda fashions.
5-Passenger Crossover
On condition that the Volkswagen Atlas and Atlas Cross Sport are additionally differentiated by seating-row rely—and are no less than completely different wanting—we marvel if the CX-70 ought to actually have been referred to as CX-90 Sport, and even CX-90 Coupe. Although the latter appears to warrant no less than some design modification.
All that mentioned, the CX-70, just like the CX-90, represents an enormous transfer ahead in Mazda’s acknowledged plan to take the model upscale. As famous earlier, the ’70 options simply two seating rows, the rearmost row provided as a 3-person bench.
Mazda Strikes Upscale
For these not within the know, Mazda has start making use of two-digit mannequin names to its latest—more-upscale—fashions. Thus, the CX-30 has changed the CX-3, the CX-50 is obtainable as an upscale model of the still-offered CX-5, and the CX-90 has changed the CX-9. The CX-70 is a brand new providing, although a compact crossover dubbed CX-7 was provided by 2012.
Costs and Trim Ranges
The CX-70 is obtainable in 5 trim ranges, in comparison with the CX-90’s six. Maybe anticipating barely much less gross sales quantity, the ’70 will not be provided in base Choose trim, and thus will not be obtainable for a beginning worth beneath $40,000, which the CX-90 is.
For 2025, the CX-70 lineup ascends by 3.3 Turbo Most well-liked ($41,900), 3.3 Turbo Premium ($47,355), 3.3 Turbo Premium Plus ($50,355), 3.3 Turbo S Premium ($53,905), and topline 3.3 Turbo S Premium Plus ($57,405).
A fast not about costs: Mazda has certainly begun transferring its crossover portfolio upmarket, or no less than has added premium trim ranges to the lineup. The final CX-9 fashions ranged in worth from $40,125 to $49,835 throughout 5 trim ranges. So, are the brand new Mazdas value the additional cash? We’ll get to that shortly.
Engines
Energy for the CX-70 comes from the identical 3.3-liter inline six because the CX-90, and in the identical two energy output configurations. That includes mild-hybrid help, the engine is rated at 340 horsepower in trim ranges that includes an “S” within the mannequin title, and 280 horsepower in lesser fashions. Each variations of the powerplant mate solely to an 8-speed computerized transmission. Mazda recommends premium-grade gasoline for the 340-horse model of the engine, common for the 280. All Mazda CX-70s come normal with AWD.
Security Gear
Be aware, too, that every one CX-70 trims come normal with Mazda’s i-Activsense complete suite of security and driver-assistance options, together with:
- Lane-departure warning
- Lane-keep help
- Automobile-exit warning (warns occupants of coming automobiles when opening doorways)
- Ahead impediment detection
- Computerized high-beams
- Adaptive cruise management
- Shopper Information not too long ago spent every week behind the wheel
Shopper Information not too long ago spent every week behind the wheel of a 2025 3.3 Turbo S Premium Plus in Polymetal Grey. Together with vacation spot cost, our check Mazda got here to $57,775.
CX-70 vs. CX-90
It ought to as no shock at this level, that the CX-70 seems and feels very very similar to the CX-90. The cabin dimensions are almost equivalent, and passenger area, entrance and rear, is identical. The identical goes for dashboard and instrumentation, and for essentially the most half, cabin trim.
What all this implies is that the CX-70 is a really good crossover, and that it’s, just like the CX-90, surprisingly luxurious. The cabin is loads roomy, and huge doorways—entrance a rear—make for simple entry and departure. There’s additionally loads of area behind the wheel, even for larger guys. The management system is a variation of Mazda’s oddly controversial rotary-dial system, which this editor finds relatively sensible. Thy system, as soon as acquainted, makes for simple eyes-on-the-road operation. Not all of our editors like “the knob,” so make sure you time enjoying with the infotainment system to make sure you’re cool with the setup.
Cabin
Rear-seat lodging are as pleasant as these up entrance. And, thank to a beneficiant quantity of glass, the cabin feels open and ethereal. Sound ranges, too, are stored low, making for simple dialog between the seating rows.
Energy and Efficiency
Underway, the CX-70 feels stable and refined. After a quick delay, the large Mazda strikes off from a cease well sufficient, and has loads of energy in S trim to maintain up with, and cross, city visitors. Likewise, there’s ample reserve thrust for simple freeway passing and merging maneuvers. Our editors did detect a specific amount of gentle surging and slowing in routine low-speed driving. We suspect the impact is said to the CX-70’s mild-hybrid system. The phenomenon is usually gentle, and never detected by any passengers we queried.
Trip and Dealing with
Although the CX-70 feels somewhat heavy when pushed, it corners with athletic confidence, and leans solely gently in aggressive cornering. The brakes, too, really feel reassuringly robust. Trip high quality is a CX-70 robust level; the midsize Mazda settles in properly on the freeway, and absorbs most floor irregularities with a simple calm.
Worth
The CX-70 enjoys somewhat extra cargo area than the CX-90, however not a lot. That’s okay, although, because the cargo space is loads roomy, and the rear seatbacks simply fold flat to accommodate bigger hundreds.
Whereas we stay baffled that the CX-70 and CX-90 are handled as separate fashions, we discover the ’70 to be a surprisingly refined, and finally luxurious entry within the midsize crossover section. Costs rise rapidly on larger trim ranges, however decrease variations of the CX-70 are fairly attractively priced. We heartily advocate the most recent Mazda to anybody in search of a premium-feeling 2-row crossover. We simply want they’d referred to as it CX-90 Sport.
Take heed to the Automobile Stuff Podcast
Mazda CX-70 3.3 Turbo S Premium Plus Photos
Click on beneath for enlarged photographs
Comments